50 people is an irrelevant sample size. Just because the findings seem to make sense doesn’t mean the study is good.
Hey there, fella! If the findings confirm my biases, sample size is irrelevant. Science has spoken! /s
Yea but how many likes and subscribes does it have tho? 🤔
No shit
It started way back in the days of cable. I remember how jarring it was to see a music video on MTV that kept changing camera shots. I was like, “you don’t even get enough time to get a good look at the band or the scene.” Then it got worse, way worse.
They have been programming people for short attention spans forever now and I hate it.
I mean this doesn’t establish a causal link at all, just confirms the obvious fact that someone with attention issues is more likely to consume short form content.
They said the same thing about Sesame Street in the 1970’s
I turned out all right.
Ah, you too live in a trash can and crave cookies?
WOW! 3 downvotes for saying I’m all right.
And no stated reason. Could be a troll farm. A Russian troll farm, or maybe a Christian troll farm. They don’t like me thinking too. It might be my EX, we still don’t get along.
I could even be Nestlé. My DECADES-long boycott is finally working.
No, they are making you dumber. I don’t use YouTube/Instagram/TikTok at all nor any other video/short platform.
I mean… looking at Shorts and Reels it’s definitely not making anyone smarter. There’s 0 value to it.
eh. good luck. i am already
No, they are making you dumber. I don’t use YouTube/Instagram/TikTok at all nor any other video/short platform.
Yeah cause Ibuprofen
