• mel ♀@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I recently found a video talkkng about privacy. One of the topic was that privacy does not ring any bell in people’s mind. Contrary to intimacy. Maybe we should all replace privacy by intimacy so we can tell what is really implied to non software people

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      the question here is, on it’s face does an invasion of privacy constitute an injury? I’d argue that yes, it does. Privacy has inherent value, and that value is lost the moment that private data is exposed. That’s the injury that needs to be redressed, regardless of whether or how the exposed data is used after the exposure. There could be additional injury in how the data is used, and that would have to be adjudicated and compensated separately, but losing the assurance that my data can never be used against me because it is only know to me is absolutely an injury in and of itself.

  • Rearsays@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I mean ok but the fact that your car is spying on you has to break a thousand big tech nda’s

  • BlackPit@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It can’t be illegal because you agree to allow them when you purchase the new vehicle. It’s all there in the T&C and PP, which no one ever reads. Don’t like it? Don’t buy new cars. I won’t.

  • iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    America sucks. Seriously. I’m just waiting for another country to bring it to the USA, because it seems inevitable.

    People gotta stop putting faith into these ultimately crooked nations.