Steam has now officially stopped supporting Windows 7, Windows 8, and Windows 8.1.::95.57 percent of surveyed Steam users are already on Windows 10 and 11, with nearly 2 percent of the remainder on Linux and 1.5 percent on Mac — so we may be talking about fewer than 1 percent of users on these older Windows builds. Older versions of MacOS will also lose support on February 15th, just a month and a half from now. Correction: It’s macOS 10.13 and 10.14 that are losing support. Not macOS period.

  • Critical_Insight@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    This is the sole reason my gaming rig is now running on Ubuntu. I have never had Linux on my personal computer before but since I was forced to update the OS anyway, I thought might aswell give Linux a shot.

    • Postcard64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s great that Linux is a feasible alternative nowadays. But it’s not like you are using Ubuntu 10.04 from 2010, right? OSs get outdated and stop being supported. That’s just the way it is.

    • BaardFigur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Dude, Windows 7/8/8.1 hasn’t been supported by Microsoft for quite a while now. No reason to support the platform, if Microsoft doesn’t

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I, for one, am glad that from a security standpoint that companies like Valve are stopping support and giving patches and stuff to people using such outdated operating systems. If you are forced to use an old OS for work because of software limitations, that’s one thing, but there should be no reason you use an old OS as your daily driver if you ain’t getting any more security updates and patches. I don’t care how long it would take to reset everything and get things set up again, upgrade your damn OS when it’s not being supported anymore!

  • Vilian@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Lmao i only knew they could stop supporting windows 7, people uae more windows 7 than windows 8

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Launching 8 for the first time was almost as bad as time I first experienced vista, so I can understand there being fewer 8 users.

        • 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I didn’t conceptually hate the UI there was just so much room for improvement in implementation, if I recall correctly. I was only using a Windows machine for a short time during that era though.

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s why the Win10 start menu was better.
            Tiles where it’s appropiate and you could even nake the start full screen to top it of.

            • Otherwise_Direction7@monyet.cc
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              And then the Windows 11 came in and replaced those sweet flexibility with generic row of icons on top with the app list now in the separate menu and the bottom of the menu is wasted on ads and other garbage

              Geez thank you Microsoft, you guys definitely went backwards with this one

              • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Not like there were sponsored tiles on Win10 (at a minimum 1803 when I started to use Windows professionally and saw lot’s of desktops)

  • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    When no longer supporting Ubuntu 16.04: No big deal, just update, duh…

    When no longer supporting Windows 7/8: How dare you!

    • homura1650@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Translating into Linux terms, Steam has dropped support for:

      • Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Hardy Heron
      • Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolian
      • regbin_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Vista was amazing and 8/8.1 was refreshing. Also, Vista introduced hardware accelerated desktop rendering in Windows, finally no more tearing. I enjoyed using them. I personally haven’t had any gripes with any of the recent Windows versions.

        • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It was during this time the transition to 64 bit systems became necessary to deal with needing to have more than 4GB of memory which was not helped by Vista using 2GB just to run, iirc. If you ran Vista 32 bit you had memory problems. If you ran Vista 64 bit you had major compatibility problems. It wasn’t until the end of Vista’s life did 64 bit go mainstream.

          • Carter@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            What can I say? I had a laptop with Vista pre-installed and it was fine.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Worst of both worlds.
      Win10 beats it by a mile.
      Only way to make the win better would be more privacy.