• Nougat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean, really, how could anyone think that the abilities to eat and to see are in any way related to human health?

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I can see their point if instead of being fleshy humans, we are androids without mouths and cameras instead of eyes.

      Then they can collect all the premiums and not have to pay out! Brilliant business strategy. Time to start converting people into robots.

  • crazycaveman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    And ears. Not covered (in the USA, at least) because “just about everyone suffers hearing loss at some point in their life” (aka not a profit maker) so might as well not cover it at all for anyone, including those with profound loss from birth…

    • zeroblood@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Canada too. At least I can get a cheap pair of glasses online, but my god is the dentist ever expensive.

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You can get teeth online, too. Even if they’re not the highest quality, they usually still have a reasonable amount of flavor left on them.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The visible state of a person’s teeth is far too useful a proxy for their position in the socioeconomic hierarchy to ever be sacrificed by making dental care affordable.