HP customers claim firmware update rendered third-party ink verboten | Then the company cranked up the price of cartridges, complaint alleges::Then the company cranked up the price of cartridges, complaint alleges

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Happened to me! Even with me taking efforts ahead of time to prevent the new firmware download, it somehow snuck through. I finally got so fed up with their BS because of this, I got rid of the hp and bought a Brother. Brother workin flawlessly, and I can rest easy knowing it will just print shit when I need it to and not try to extort cash from me to do so.

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Y’all gonna make me look up the German dictionary so I know what verboten means, gawd damn I don’t need no education

    (To be fair it’s interesting that they’d throw a random German word into an English language headline meant for English language readers, especially as it’s the key explanatory word in the headline, and yet it’s one we wouldn’t commonly know. Unlike commonly used non-English words like Information, or Cul-de-sac, Zeitgeist, Kaput, or Baguette, we - to my knowledge - haven’t used the word verboten before over here).

    So yeah, I had to Google translate it xD But now I know! Woo!

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Past participle of “bieten”, “to bid”, as in “to command”. English correspondence to that is “bidden”. The prefix is “ver-” which here denotes completative aspect as well as negativity, the English correspondence to that is “for-” (not strict, but at least in this case). Sticking both together you get “forbidden” which indeed is the right translation. “The action of commanding a negative has been completed”, or, simply, “You’ve been told not to”.

  • LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I just found out about the last time HP did this. I didn’t realize they were about to try it all over again. I guess they realized that any plan that looks good once is worth attempting again, by slowly wearing down the opposition. Like Google did with breaking ad blockers.

  • OutrageousUmpire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    HP isn’t what it used to be. I’ve got an HP color laser printer that has been cranking for more than ten years, while using third party toner. It’s sad seeing them like this now.

  • vojel@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Not related: but is „verboten“ (forbidden) really used in English? Just wondering because it is German.

  • SteveDinn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Somebody tell me again why we, as a society, still print things? Other than publishing, why do we need printers?

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      cmon now. no victim blaming.

      what if i just want to print a coloring book for my kid? there are perfectly valid reason to want to print things, and it should not be as difficult/stupid as it is today.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Some of my clients want a physical invoice. My CPA wants hard copy for notation. I want physical copies of certain documents for ease of use. The DMV won’t take electronic copies of proof of residency. CVS insists on providing a mile long receipt.

      There are a million more. Most of it breaks down to people’s preferences and bureaucracy. It’ll be a long time before hard copy goes away.