This is so funny because rust has one of the worst cheating situations and majority of their players are windows users, and theres lots of games that have anticheat that allows linux and have notably less significant cheating problems like marvel rivals. in reality rust doesn’t take cheating very seriously because if they did they would have more server side software that detects illegitimate behaviour like tons of other games do successfully… even most popular Minecraft servers have better functioning anti cheat that is completely server side than rust has while getting kernel access to your pc. its pathetic and lazy development tbh and this entire post from them reads like such extreme cope…

  • thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    even most popular Minecraft servers have better functioning anti cheat that is completely server side

    Why isn’t this the standard everywhere? These servers prove that server side anticheat works.

    • AAA@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      It is. All games have this kind of server side verification which denies not allowed actions. The difference is in Minecraft it comes down to “no, you cannot fly, or” no, you cannot build a pig spawner because you don’t have one in you inventory". But in Counter Strike you need to decide if one player’s 14ms headsbot is legit, while some other player’s 20ms kill was not. Or if someone was acting on information they shouldn’t have (radar and wall hacks). That’s orders of magnitudes harder.

      Generally speaking, the slower a game, and the less hand eye coordination are necessary, the easier is server side cheat detection. On the other side, there’s chess…