This gets us to the central problem of today’s surveillance state. No one running the cameras wants to be observed. One reason that city officials object to releasing Flock data, for example, must that they themselves are among the recorded. The cameras are on them too; they too can be tracked. Everything means everything for these everywhere cameras.

    • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Best option is to recommend people self host their camera feeds. People aren’t going to give cameras up, myself included, but keeping it all out of the ring/nest/netvue or any other cloud system is the way to go.

      People can record in public, and that includes the area around their houses. Having 100s of thousands or millions of cameras sharing feeds with law enforcement for warrantless surveillance or corporate data hounds for more people tracking is the issue.

    • phar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      No thank you, it’s very useful and not shared. I have the right to video my own property.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      And why would I? My cameras record to my sever and nobody sees the cast majority of the footage.