• nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    IMO, a more opionate search would fix this. Just recommend the most active community and show the others in gray.

      • nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m not sure if the centralization is worse than the large portion of users on the large servers who joining copies of established communities on their own instances. Also, from my other reply:

        It would force you to write a more descriptive name. Maybe we want to hide by community title and not the handle though.

        Say you want to have a community for memes. It is terrible UX if you just see seven different “memes@domainname.ending” in the result. So with an opinionated search, you instead name your community Sopuli Memes, Solarpunk Memes, Programming Memes etc., or just Funny Memes Archive, and they would not be hidden.

    • kubofhromoslav@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Technically yes. The problem would be how to decide which community put in spotlight and which in grey (or any other meaningful distinction). Would it be automatic (if yes, how to decide the algorithm), or manual (if yes, how to decide how to left them). These things can be discussed out and solved, but we should be aware that these questions are here.

      And it would work only for real duplicates of communities, not healthy separated communities based on actual, conscious and cherished differences.