AI one-percenters seizing power forever is the real doomsday scenario, warns AI godfather::The real risk of AI isn't that it'll kill you. It's that a small group of billionaires will control the tech forever.

  • treefrog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Business Insider warning about late stage capitalism feels more than a little ironic.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Today on PBS, we got an insider warning from a lifelong Republican that the fascism got put of hand and is going for full autocracy, even though he'd been pushing through pro-fash policies for the last thirty years.

      Everyone thinks The One Ring will be theirs to control.

    • CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      As does being warned of technological oligarchs monopolizing AI by someone who works for fucking Meta.

  • Beefalo@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Well we know that, but anybody who does anything less than clap and sing about it gets treated like trash by the huge wave of people who immediately trusted the crazy thing with their lives. It's the fucking iPhone all over again. So hooray for AI.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, my own Dad calls me an "activist" now (in a deragotory manner). I never leave my house most days… But okay. I'm an activist because I think AI is a tangible threat to the working class. I've said only a few sentences to my Dad about it. But yeah… I guess I'm the problem for not finding some creative way to profit off LLM's yet.

    • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yep. As dangerous as that could be, it's better then centralizing it. There are already systems like GPT4all that come with good models that are slower then things like Chat GPT but work similarly well.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I've been thinking about how to do that. The code for most AI is pretty basic and uninteresting. It's mostly modifying the input for something usable. Companies could open source their entire code base without letting anything important out.

      The dataset is the real problem. Say you want to classify fruit to check if it's ripe enough for harvesting. You'll need a whole lot of pictures of your preferred fruit where it's both ripe and not ripe. You'll want people who know the fruit to classify those images, and then you can feed it into a model. It's a lot of work, and needs to attract a bunch of people to volunteer their time. Largely the sort of people who haven't traditionally been a part of open source software.