Another great article from 404 Media highlighting the power that the tech giants have amassed over how how we use the internet.

This brings me, I think, to the elephant in the room, which is the fact that Google has its hands on quite literally every aspect of this entire saga as a vertically integrated adtech giant.

This extreme power over the adtech and online advertising ecosystem is one of the subjects of an FTC antitrust suit against Google.

  • djsoren19@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of people have become entitled to the idea of the "free internet." In some cases, it's understandable, like for social media where the platform is doing very little work and nearly all the value is coming from the users. I think especially in Youtube's case, people are squinting and looking at it like a social media. They wonder why Youtube's taking such a big cut when they think the content creators are the ones providing the value.

    The issue here is that the complexities of video hosting, especially at the speed and quality Youtube provides, requires a ludicrous amount of effort and money. Youtube is providing a platform that is nearly unthinkable, something I consider to rival the entire television broadcasting sphere. The idea that such a colossal undertaking could be achieved without requiring revenue generation is simply naïve, and it's incredible to think that a free version is even offered at all. Nobody ever really thinks about that though, they just look at it as another platform like Facebook or Reddit, and think a lazy megacorp is stuffing their pockets for nothing.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can see how hard they optimized by watching a very old video you uploaded yourself.
      Exanple of mine:
      I uploaded 3 videos some time (2x 9 years and 1x 6 years) ago with about 1min of runtime each.
      They do not get clicked much.
      Timing it, it took Google about 3 seconds to view it the best available resolution.
      Only 3 seconds is insane if one remembers how long a drive needs to just spin up from standby. And that is not even with a cached video.

      Now I wanna see how long it would take a competitor to achieve the same performance.

      I remember some time ago when YT took about 10-15sec to do the same task. They heavily improved their performance. Even for low performance content.

      Sad that some are so entitled.