• exu@feditown.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m always annoyed at the “AirDrop alternative” marketing. It’s not. It requires both of your devices to share a network.

    The truest AirDrop alternative that uses discovery and ad-hoc connections between devices is FlyingCarpet. It definitely needs a simpler UI though.

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      I was gonna say… “no internet connection required” is not the key attribute of AirDrop. AirDrop doesn’t even require a network connection. It’s a weird comparison.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Conference meeting test: you and a bunch of strangers gather for a quick q&a after a conference talk, the author wants to share their slidedeck with you. Everyone has whatever solution you are evaluating pre installed but your strangers so you have nothing setup specifically for this group… How many button presses across everyone does it take to share the slides?

      Wait, I don’t see you. Are you on the conference wifi? No I’m on call data, join the conference wifi. What’s the password. Ok. Thanks. I joined it, I don’t see the file. Which wifi are you on? Oh I’m on 5g. This is too complicated join my hot spot. Fuck I can’t see your hotspot, turn airplane mode on and off. I joined it but I don’t see anyone…

    • unskilled5117@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That does definitely replicate the feature of AirDrop more closely. Do you have any experience with it? Does it work reliably?

      A thing to look out for is Wifi Aware, which would enable the functionality if implemented. That is what was recently also used by google to enable android<->ios Airdrop