• Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can’t believe people always use this crypto-spam browser.

      • Valarie@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I use it for school shit because they don’t work with iceraven(my preferred mobile Firefox fork)

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I use it to pirate sports streams and thats pretty much it. It just works better than Firefox for some reason.

    • Hellfire103@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, it does do a fantastic job of removing ads and reducing fingerprinting.

      • Samsy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        So does Librewolf. What’s the benefit of brave? Chrome-based? Checked chromium from time to time and don’t think chrome is superior over Firefox.

        • Hellfire103@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          Neither do I. I use Mullvad Browser, which is based on Firefox.

          Brave has its own content blocking system, which is on-par with uBO and better than uBO Lite. I tested it myself a while back, and Cover Your Tracks, Fingerprint.com, and CreepJS indicated that it was incredibly difficult to fingerprint: moreso than Librewolf, but slightly less so than Tor/Mullvad.

          That said, however, PrivacyTests.org indicates that Librewolf blocks more tracking technologies than Brave, so it’s possible things have changed since I last experimented with browsers other than Tor and Mullvad.

            • pineapple@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Wow I got downvoted a lot on that I thought it was a generally agreed upon fact. Source (graphene os)

              I still use firefox btw because I prefer it for many other reasons but chromium is definetely more secure.

              • pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                GraphaneOS founder has fetish for Chromium and he hates F-Droid 1

                tldr: he accuse f-droid not being secure and citing this bs post https://privsec.dev/posts/android/f-droid-security-issues/ and he promotes accrescent.app

                • they contain closed-source app
                • they have very flawed understanding of open-source and security 2, 3

                here is some examples:

                Open source doesn’t necessarily mean more secure. I’m aware of many open source apps with numerous well-known security vulnerabilities, as well as many closed-source apps that are highly secure. Furthermore, Accrescent will have a filter to, for example, show only open source apps, so your treatment is incomprehensible.

                Accrescent doesn’t claim to serve only open-source apps and never has out of the belief that an app’s source model doesn’t inherently make it more or less private or secure. Qlango doesn’t violate any explicit or implicit Accrescent policy by the properties you listed, so it would be inappropriate to remove it.

                …In addition, “trackers” are subjective. Accrescent has no plans to enumerate specific libraries or classes and blacklist them solely based on the fact that they connect to Google, Amazon, etc.; collect analytics; or contain proprietary code. This approach isn’t scalable anyway because it is trivial to bypass such detection methods.

                So I take everything GraphaneOS says with a grain of salt

              • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                One source from a sadly biased author. I am honestly too lazy to aggregate some numbers for CVEs to find out what’s the truth but I am sure that it is not an inherent quality of chromium to be more secure.

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    How can Thunderbird be the third favourite Email service, when it’s not even an email service? It’s a mail user agent.

    Or do they mean the Thundermail service available in the Thunderbird Pro Subscription?

    • Alb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yes but it is free (email address) with an acces to 5 countries (Netherlands, Romania, Japan and 2 others i never used). To extend it worldwide you have to subscribe to a premium account.

      • UnknowableNight@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It`s 10 countries. USA, Canada, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Switzerland, Romana, Japan, Norway, and Singapore, though it connects randomly and you can’t choose the IP

      • ItsMyVault101@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I was asking because I used Mullvad in the past and I love the fact that not even they know who you are because to them you are just a random generated number, which occasionally gets 5€ deposited.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    You know I just remembered that no one actually confirmed whether DuckDuckGo wasn’t just a honeypot for the NSA because it didn’t become big until after thr Snowden leaks lol.