• 1dalm@lemmings.worldOP
      101·
      3 months ago

      To stick to the theme of my chart, since Unitarian Universalism is non-trinitarian it would likely need to be a Unix-like OS that isn’t Linux. I would give it OpenSolaris. (And that’s a compliment.)

      • jqubed@lemmy.world
        3·
        3 months ago

        I think several on your chart don’t believe in the Trinity? Pretty sure LDS, JW, and at least some Pentecostal? I think they all self-identify as Christian, though, but some Unitarians might not? Is that the difference?

        • 1dalm@lemmings.worldOP
          3·
          3 months ago

          That’s my exact thought process. I put LDS at Android because they do identify as Christian, but we are really stretching the definition of what technically counts as Christian.

          Honestly I don’t know as much as I ought to about UU, but I didn’t think that they generally identify as Christian.

          • jqubed@lemmy.world
            1·
            3 months ago

            I looked up Lineage and see it’s also an Android variant. What’s the Pentecostal logo?

            • 1dalm@lemmings.worldOP
              2·
              3 months ago

              Pentecostal is KaOS.

              A built-from-scratch Linux that doesn’t rely on any of the other branches and just does is own kinda specific thing. (You can probably suggest something better. I was kinda running out of ideas for that one.)

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    8·
    3 months ago

    I understand very few of these, except for arch, slack and the bottom row.

    How is ope suse and chrome Os related? Are baptist and southern baptist very different?

    • 1dalm@lemmings.worldOP
      7·
      3 months ago

      Arch is the denomination that is super proud of itself, despite being messed up for most people. OpenSuse is Baptist due to it’s general reliability and flexibility. ChromeOS is Southern Baptist because it’s barely recognizable as Linux.

        • notthebees@reddthat.com
          3·
          3 months ago

          That would imply Judaism copied Zoroastrianism’s homework. Since they came around the same time, it would be something else. Zoroastrianism should be AmigaOS. Judaism should be Unix. Would islam be Solaris? Would Wahhabism be Solaris post oracle?

            • notthebees@reddthat.com
              2·
              3 months ago

              I guess. But it feels very different from Judaism as best as I can tell. And Zoroastrianism is still seperate from the big 3 monotheistic religions.

              • 1dalm@lemmings.worldOP
                1·
                3 months ago

                The guy is really just not right about that. There was a lot of cultural mixing going around back in the early iron age, but Judaism borrowed much more from the Egyptians, Babylonians, and the Greeks than they did the Persians. And it also has a lot of very unique features as well.

                Yes there was also cultural exchange with the Persians that found it’s way into Judaism, but it’s just not correct to say it’s a copy.

      • notthebees@reddthat.com
        2·
        3 months ago

        What would Islam be? Gnu Herd?

        Edit: I made the joke in a different comment but Islam would be Solaris and Wahhabism would be post oracle Solaris.

  • meow@discuss.tchncs.de
    62·
    3 months ago

    First up: FreeBSD is NOT a Linux distribution, and secondly, is NetBSD so small that it is nowhere to be found?

    Berkeley software distribution ≠ Linux (or gnu+Linux, which is btw not true for all distros.)

  • BlindFrog@lemmy.world
    4·
    3 months ago

    How do I know this isn’t proganda from Big Christianity?

    ~guess this chart makes me metheodist tho~

  • Ghostie@lemmy.zip
    4·
    3 months ago

    Every time I come on here I see another distro I haven’t heard about. This time it was Puppy Linux.

  • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
    3·
    3 months ago

    Spot on as a FreeBSD and macOS user but those are UNIX rather than Linux (though I use Alpine Linux pretty heavily too).

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      51·
      3 months ago

      FreeBSD and macOS user but those are UNIX rather than Linux

      Yes, and the meme is which branch of christianity the OS is the equivalent of.

      “Atheism” and “Spiritual but not religious” are not braches of christianity

      • 1dalm@lemmings.worldOP
        4·
        3 months ago

        “Atheism” and “Spiritual but not religious” are not braches of christianity

        Is the joke really that complicated?

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          3·
          3 months ago

          I mean, he didn’t get it, and to me that’s one of the easier ones… Unless you mean the devil logo for free bsd

          Also, yeah, the target audience knows the OSes better than the denominations, that’s why we don’t understand how they correlate.

          Maybe write an explanation?