• somedaysoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It doesn’t help, because I can’t trust it’s accurate, and neither should you. As I said, you can’t recall what the container was using, you can’t tell me any specific numbers like what you might consider to be too high, so how do you expect me to trust that you definitely, for sure would have noticed something that might have been as small as a 300MB swing?

    Do you understand how this is not helpful in any way now?

    • Vexz@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you understand how this is not helpful in any way now?

      No, because you’re just talking about how much RAM SearXNG consumes. In your original post you were complaining about a memory leak. I monitor the ressources of my NAS. Even after a restart of my NAS where every container was freshly started the RAM consumption wasn’t higher than a month later after the restart (without restarting any of the docker containers). And that is why I can with full conviction tell that my SearXNG instance didn’t leak memory.

      This discussion is going nowhere from here so I’m gonna stop responding. I said everything to make my point as clear as possible. Have a nice day.