• Metal Zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    This unfortunately helps sets a precedent for what the internet is going to look like in the future. Even the most basic things will be behind a paywall.
    You cant even read a fucking news article from New York Times, who made 173.91 million dollars last year

    • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      A lot of things are already like that. IIUC this is restrictions on the API not the subs themselves. If you’d like you can still go to the site to download specific subs. What you can’t do is use bazarr to bulk download subs. Personally I bought vip since I found the free tier API limit pretty bad and I didn’t think the price was so bad for what you get back. Feel free to disagree tho. Before I automated my setup I was just manually searching for subs for movies I wanted and that worked pretty well and will continue to do so if you’d prefer that.

    • lud@lemm.eedeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

        • lud@lemm.eedeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • Jerkface@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 years ago

            I don’t know what is so controversial about this statement. Investigative reporting is fucking expensive. The people who do it need to eat. If you’re not paying for it, who is?

            • lud@lemm.eedeleted by creator
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

          • Metal Zealot@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 years ago

            You mean the world renowned, universally known news agency in America owned by billionaires?

            • lud@lemm.eedeleted by creator
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

      • Spazsquatch@lemmy.studio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        True, but just look at how much better it has gotten in the last couple decades. Putting the news behind the paywall runs the risk of ending the battle for impressions and might force nuance into well researched stories.