To identify a “safe” level of alcohol consumption, valid scientific evidence would need to demonstrate that at and below a certain level, there is no risk of illness or injury associated with alcohol consumption. The new WHO statement clarifies: currently available evidence cannot indicate the existence of a threshold at which the carcinogenic effects of alcohol “switch on” and start to manifest in the human body.
Apparently according to something I also read the amount of carcinogen you are exposed to on a 18 minute walk next to a low but noticeable traffic (I remember it saying 20ish cars per minute) is orders of magnitude stronger in regards to cancer causing factors in daily life.
I’m not 100% certain about equating carcinogenic effects to causing cancer but I don’t know any other reason to talk about carcinogens.
Sorry to bother you, this was all a nothing burger. Sorry I asked and wasted your time, and mine too
No amount of alcohol is safe to drink, and this is why.
Running Microsoft Windows applications in your head is probably not memory safer or safe in other ways either.
What do you mean when you used the word safe? Genuinely curious, not just being a dick
No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health
Oh that. Bloody useless as I understand it.
Apparently according to something I also read the amount of carcinogen you are exposed to on a 18 minute walk next to a low but noticeable traffic (I remember it saying 20ish cars per minute) is orders of magnitude stronger in regards to cancer causing factors in daily life.
I’m not 100% certain about equating carcinogenic effects to causing cancer but I don’t know any other reason to talk about carcinogens.
Sorry to bother you, this was all a nothing burger. Sorry I asked and wasted your time, and mine too
Nonsense.