I’ve tried giving screenshots of phishing emails to a local Qwen instance and so far it always correctly detected it as scam, even points out the exact elements that it based its judgement on. Sending screenshots to it ad-hoc isn’t too scalable for family and friends. I’d like to be able to either forward emails for screening, or perhaps have it screen everything from a mailbox.

Has anyone done anything like this? Is there anything self-hostable that does this?

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Good point. It’ll have to have no access to the internet or anything local outside of its container. Just text in, text out.

    • Dran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      You could (and probably should) use a system-one style inference system for spam classification. Much cheaper and the structured output means it’s impossible to go rogue and curl some malware or whatever. It can absolutely misclassify but its output is programmatically structured and just ranks a pre-selected set of output tokens.

      In your case that’s

      Spam

      Not_spam

      • tigerhawkvok@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I only read about that today, so I hadn’t even considered that angle. They’re doing some cool stuff in that space. jeff is the self-hostable one that does best as far as I know.

        • Dran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          You actually have a lot of options in this space. You can take the prefill engine of just about any LLM and turn it’s transformer into a classifier by lobotomizing out the decoder. You can also use a diffusion model on single pass to surprisingly competent result.

          If Jeff looks easy enough to deploy by all means start there, but don’t discount the idea if Jeff sucks; you have a lot of options.

    • Zikeji@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah if it’s just a basic input with a function call for spam or not spam the risk is low. What’s the worst case outcome, it tricks it into saying no it isn’t a scam and you have to delete it manually? Hahaha