For me its KDE.

  • Sentau@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve heard it’s not great for gaming anyway

    Gaming on wayland now has more or less the same performance as on x11. Some things like vrr (atleast on plasma) is even better/easier on wayland than on x11

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Vrr? Did you mean vr?

      Also maybe I should try it on my PC then, haven’t tested it there though can’t really see any need for it as my monitors are similar resolution there

      • Sentau@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I meant variable refresh rate by vrr.

        though can’t really see any need for it as my monitors are similar resolution there

        Well wayland may help if the refresh rates of the monitor is different. Also Wayland will be the only one supported in the future as if I understand correctly, X11 is no longer supported

        • flashgnash@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          One has 144hz 1440p and one is 60hz1080p, I’ve got one of them running on 170hz on x11 afaik, what’s normally the problem with differing refresh rates?

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Variable refresh rate changes the refresh rate of your screen dynamically according to in-game fps. Think Freesync and G-Sync.