Hi, I’ve been using Linux on and off for 20ish years, finally made the switch, and the one thing that has always driven me nuts is the file managers.

As an example, when I attach images to posts on websites, I get a nice window to popup to choose which file I want. This popup is ass. It only gives me a tiny preview of the file (images) that I have currently selected. There’s no way to change views to thumbnails, right click and open in an image viewer to double check that I am uploading the correct file, none of it. I have to navigate to the folder in another window and double check filenames if there is no preview. (This is getting more common because of webp images.)

I have a host of other complaints about the file manager on here and most I’ve come across, but this is the most annoying issue for me.

I am on Ubuntu Cinnamon at the moment.

To add to this since the file picker is something different. I dislike the file manager as well because of lots of reasons, but the biggest being that when I’m using thumbnails, it looks like all the files are only slightly aligned to a grid. Everything is off by just enough to annoy the shit out of me.

  • mihnt@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    although if you like gnome, why are you on cinnamon

    I mean, isn’t cinnamon just a better version of gnome 2?

    i’m presuming you know what i mean by qt and gtk. if you don’t just tell me

    I generally understand it as the frontends for the applications, no?

    but if you’re already set up you won’t get that much out of switching

    I was running Mint on a VM last night and it really just felt like what I am already using so I’m 100% inclined to agree.

    • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, isn’t cinnamon just a better version of gnome 2?

      oh yeah that’s fair. it’s only gnome 3 that’s awful

      I generally understand it as the frontends for the applications, no

      it’s just that i imagine you know more than me about linux, having used it for longer, but i didn’t want to assume that and have you floundering and confused

      • mihnt@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s just that i imagine you know more than me about linux, having used it for longer, but i didn’t want to assume that and have you floundering and confused

        I’d say I’m an average user. I can use command line fine to a degree. Most of it’s just googling what I need to do and copy/pasting though, lol. Advanced stuff like building programs from source and all that is way out my scope though. I ain’t got time for all that nonsense.

        • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          same. to be honest, that’s mostly why i’m on Debian - from what i could tell it had the largest repositories. i did try arch on my laptop and one markdown editor took over half an hour to compile so i just gave up

      • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        honestly i feel like that’s their attitude toward everything? maybe i missed the glory days of gnome, but now i see it as only useful if you’re A) a gnome developer, or B) have exactly the same workflow as a gnome developer. otherwise it’s useless unless you want a bunch of extensions that break every update

        • Emperor Palpapeen@mastodon.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @Zeus I agree! I am not sure who they think they are making it for, and I fail to understand why so many distros still default to it. It is still usable, of course, but a lot of what they have done to it is very user-hostile