Oracle responds to Red Hat

  • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 年前

    Me neither. And I always wondered why you wouldn’t just go directly to the source and go with RedHat for enterprise usecases. Perhaps cheaper support contracts?

    • smo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 年前

      We struggled with red hat because our product is usually in airgapped installations. We know how many we’ve sold, but we don’t know how many are still in use.

      Say a customer buys one unit. Then 5 years later, they replace it. And 5 years on, they replace it again. On the books that’s 3 sold. We don’t know that two were retired, we don’t know these are all the same installation. So red hat wants us to pay 3 annual licences for this, and those licences don’t end until we can prove the installation was retired. The costs effectively snowball indefinitely.

      We wanted to pay - it was the easiest route to certain federal qualifications. But we couldn’t come to an agreement on how to pay.

          • SALT@lemmy.my.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 年前

            Rocky still walkaround using UBI source, and it’s open, so in the end it’s 99.99% compatible with RHEL.

            Just fuck CIQ with their contract…