Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

  • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Fair. But I’m on lemmy for discussion. I don’t want threads’ bobbleheaded userbase fucking up every discussion thread on lemmy. So I will stay on instances that have de-federated that shithole and urge other instances to do the same.

    • masimatutu@nerdica.net
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      But they won’t. Seeing how little even the relatively federation-conscious Mastodonians interact with Lemmy, from Threads it will be close to zero (especially since the devs are very “careful” with federation and probably won’t display article-formatted posts anytime soon).

      • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m not comfortable with assuming the dregs of Facebook will leave Lemmy alone. I’ll stick to instances that have defederated and I’ll actively block instances that don’t.

        I’m not out here trying to stop you from being on federated instances or anyone else. But I will not personally support instances that allow that monster into the ecosystem.

        • masimatutu@nerdica.net
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          You know that if you actively blocked the instances that are federated with Threads you wouldn’t have seen this post, right (lemmy.world/instances)? I’m also only active on instances that block Threads, but blocking those who don’t is an excessive measure.

          • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Like I said, I don’t care what others do. But for me the correct answer is to not interact with users from that platform.

            When I start seeing threads users in .world lemmy comment sections I will block .world.

            • masimatutu@nerdica.net
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              That’s not how federation works. If you’re on an instance that doesn’t allow Threads, you won’t see them at all, even when viewing posts coming from other instances.

              • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I am given to understand that I will still see the comments from threads users on lemmy. Just not the posts from threads.

                • masimatutu@nerdica.net
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  You’re confusing defederation with Lemmy’s instance blocking. Defederation means that none of a server’s content is federated. Lemmy’s new instance blocking feature, however, only blocks communities and not users.

                  • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    I don’t think I was confusing the defed from blocking, I was confused about what you meant. Thanks for the clarification.