Channel 1 AI released a promotional video explaining how the service will provide personalized news coverage to users from finance to entertainment.

  • quo@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s already scripted and choreographed, with a team of people making decisions behind any anchor.

    So yes, this fundamentally changes nothing.

    • MondayToFriday@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The example where an interview of a victim of Hurricane Ciaran, originally in French, was deepfaked to be speaking English, was pretty scary. Some people will think that it’s just for convenience, but for me, it’s a step too far down the slippery slope. If they were to do the same for a politician, a slight nuance in how a phrase was translated could change everything.

      • Illogicalbit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s only a matter of time till someone moves a stock market for profit with a deep fake. If it hasn’t happened already.

      • bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah for any sort of interviews I’d rather they kept the current convention of using a voice over, often after a 1-2 second clip of the original audio. It’s obvious that it’s a translation done by the media and not the exact original words of the source

        • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          a leaky abstraction is better because it reveals what is actually happening. That is better to me too. Heck I worry about the voice-overs giving an unfair or inaccurate version of what is being said.