• edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is what you show people when they say they don’t care about privacy because they have nothing to hide.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yet another reason why IoT crap sucks. You don’t need to put everything on the internet. This one should be obvious.

    • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      People don’t think about that. You have to register somewhere in order to use your $12.99 cam, install some app and are good to go.

      How would a someone not interested in tech know that the footage data is stored on some online server and you are at the mercy of their itsec.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Which is why these companies that are marketing wifi and cloud-polling devices should be held responsible for the data breaches and regulated more rigorously.

        It should be cost-prohibitive to design a smart device that sends data to a centralized server, but they do it because the upside value of having the data is so attractive. They shouldn’t be allowed to hide behind a ToS agreement with mandatory arbitration when their security is inevitably breached.

        • Treczoks@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Good luck holding a company sitting in China “responsible” for about anything.

    • realharo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      With end to end encryption, and requiring manual key transfer (no key sync), this would not be an issue.

  • fhek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hypothetically I want to secure my home with Cameras…

    What’s the best way to do this? OSS preferably.

    • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      No-internet cameras hooked up to local storage.

      For remote access, you could use whatever you want to use for remotely accessing local files.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    why the fuck would anyone put a camera in their bedroom, or bathroom?

    Outside of people making porn, securing the entrances to a home should be sufficient, no need to video yourself sleeping.

    • 01011@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They may have people working in their homes whom they do not fully trust - cleaners, maids, nannies etc.

    • xhci@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      My dogs sleep in there, and we like to watch them if they’re crated during the day. While I’m home… yeah, those cameras get unplugged 10/10 times.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      How is the room relevant here? Is it not a grave invasion of privacy regardless in which room of the house it was? What even is your point, that if the camera had been in the living room instead… then what?

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The room is extremely relevant. The activities that happen on your patio, in your living room, are different than the activities that happen in your bedroom. Some of those activities are more sensitive than others

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Not at all. But there would be less sensitive material to be observed in that instance. Just because there’s different severities, doesn’t mean anything except the ultimate severity is acceptable.

    • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Sus af bruh wtf

      Edit because im being down voted, i find it so insane that you guys are actively seeking out hacked ip cam footage from innocent people that’s being leaked online.

      There’s tons of porn on the Internet, and no reason for you all to be trying to PAY SOMEONE for non-consensual sexual footage