• krellor@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Since everyone else gave a joke answer I’ll take a stab in the dark and say the upper limits would be the availability of hydrogen and physical limitations in transforming heat output into electricity. The hydrogen is the most common element but 96% of it is currently produced from fossil fuels. After that, it would be how well you can scale up turbines to efficiently convert heat to electricity.

    • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you have fusion energy, creating H2 from water via electrolysis is a joke. You can do it at home. It only requires a lot of energy. But with energy from fusion it will become super easy, barely an inconvenient

        • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It is muuuuuuuuuuch lower. The actual energy is incomparable, like an ant vs superman level of energy.

          The energy in practice it’ll be extracted from H2 has to be much higher for the process to have a practical use

      • Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        In the news, 5.000 years later : “Scientists warned that our mass extraction of hydrogen may produce global salinization, but no one wants to reduce its energy consumption.”

    • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Electrolysis has up to 70% efficiency and needs sulfuric acid. The superheated thing has about 90% efficiency.