Mercedes-Benz debuts turquoise exterior lights to indicate the car is self-driving | A visual indicator for other drivers::undefined

    • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Aye, credit where it’s due; this is a great way to differentiate between human and machine controlled devices. It’s detectable by both, and can help in cases where people blame the autodrive, or car companies claim human error.

    • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      tells me what cars i need to be extra careful around.

      yes i know people are horrible at driving, but at least the average person is predictable.

      Rule #1: constant foresight and respect to other drivers

      Rule #2: Expect mistakes, illegal u-turns, and people taking right of way

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Eventually the reverse will be equally important. So this will be a good idea for decades at least.

        • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          because the’re mostly tested under extremely safe conditions, and current self driving regularly asks you to take back over (you also have to still pay attention and have your hands on the wheel) which makes it level 2. by definition, the human is driving.

  • adaveinthelife@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 months ago

    Just seeing a turn signal on a Mercedes or BMW is enough for me to assume the driver isn’t the one in control.

  • ULS@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    Watch this turn into a status thing that starts trending.

    • Epzillon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      As someone living in a country which haven’t seen any self-driving cars I’d just be a lot more cautious/careful if I’d ever get close to anything with those lights.

      • Knocturnal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        AI with all those sensors prob drives better than many city drivers I interact daily changing lanes and doing parallel parking.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          California has had several high profile problems with self driving cars. This is going to be a disaster, physically and politically. This is literally just rich people buying a legal defense for hitting pedestrians. There’s going to be outrage the first time it happens and it turns out the driver wasn’t even looking at the road, or was drunk.

          • Knocturnal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Ofc there are gonna be issues but I kinda asume drunk driver and person who lack observation has lower chance of hitting someone with car that has any kind of assistance. There are prob more times driving assistance helped than caused problem.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Sure, but that shouldn’t absolve them of responsibility. They should still be required to pay attention and apply the brakes or take control if required. These systems do not have a 100 percent safety record. So to say we don’t need the human as a check anymore is bonkers.

        • danque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          And don’t forget the human panic response. One of my primary reasons to only allow ai driving. People that kick on the gas in an emergency situation should not be allowed to drive ever, unless hitting the gas was the right choice of course. But seeing people not stop but hit the gas in a panic is the worst thing to see happening.

  • XenGi@lemmy.chaos.berlin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Even if this would be a good idea, you can’t just put some non regulated lights on a car. This would need a law change in Germany to be approved and would probably take years of burocrazy until she get beards figured out the exact hue these lights need to emit. But I guess Mercedes already wrote that law for our government to copy. How convenient.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      But I guess Mercedes already wrote that law for our government to copy. How convenient.

      How dare a company try to work with governments to create a new safety feature!

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      No law change needed, the StZVO is a mere decree. Also EU law takes precedence Mercedes probably isn’t even going to bother getting it through German bureaucracy but will go straight to Brussels.

    • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Either way, it’s a useful starting point for the conversation to be had I guess.

      Better for some proactivity then nobody ever progressing anything, right?

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    And I live in California. Of course we’re going to help rich people avoid all consequences of their actions. Because paying attention to where your 1 ton metal missile is going is too much to ask. But only if you can afford the turquoise lights.

  • feecoomeeq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think it would be also cool to have an indicator if the car in front of you has cruise control on

  • Noxy@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I was just thinking, gosh, it’s been awhile since a new car signal dropped. This is a super interesting idea - not sure if it’s a GOOD idea but seems worth exploring

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      So you don’t call the cops when you overtake them and see then eating a bowl of cereal, jerking it, while watching Flinstones.

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I would love to have an indicator for adaptive cruise control because the way it only reacts to the car right in front of you rather aggressively means it causes shockwave traffic jams unless the human driver behind you keeps enough distance.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Humans are already experts at causing shockwave traffic jams, so I wouldn’t count on them to reduce them.