• GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes, this is still necessary.

    It wouldn’t make sense to put the onus to block every bad instance onto every single user.

    Consider the extreme use case, which is obviously CSAM. I rely on my instance admins to handle that for me. If I had to painstakingly block every instance that has poor moderation (or worse), I’d simply stop using Lemmy. The “all” feed would be utterly unusable.

    Also, admins need control over what’s in their own database, potentially for legal reasons.

    • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is where I’m currently at with “not technically nsfw but I don’t want people thinking I’m like that” trying to block anime communities centered around not-technically-nude pictures.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah as an instance admin sorry not sorry I defederated most anime things like that. You want that? You host it. I don’t need the feds knocking down my door.

        • Fal@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Lol wtf? The feds are going to knock down your door because of anime pics of people that aren’t even nude?

        • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Honestly if the feds are going to even take the effort to move personnel to your house and knock your door, when it’s quite unlikely the server is hosted physically at your house in the first place, you could take the opportunity to offer them cheap consulting on technology, international cultures (anime and stuff) and federation.

          Heck, you can aim at their ego. “I tricked you, right guys? That means I’m pretty good.”

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      An onus is a responsibility. A responsibility is power. It’s a simple fact that someone who chooses their own content source blocklists has more personal power than a person for whom someone else makes the selection.

      And, it takes time and mental energy which we certainly don’t have to spare. It’s a very heavy onus that way

  • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes. As an admin of an instance who really doesn’t want child porn on my server, I’m gonna defederate the shit out of any instance that doesn’t take care of such content in a reasonable time. And in my opinion, loli is child porn, so defederating there as well.

    Other than that, anything that’s illegal in my jurisdiction.

    And the last category, spam and bigotry. Basically anything that puts too much work on my plate - if I get dozens of reports a day for users of a single instance (and I agree with the reports), I’ll defederate, because no one’s paying for my time.

    So these are some valid reasons for me to defederate. There are probably more.

  • oleorun@real.lemmy.fan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best part about Lemmy: if you disagree with the way an instance is run, you can setup your own and do what you want to do.

    Personally I leave it up to people to block instances. The only instances I’ve had to block are the ones that post illegal content like CSAM.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      And users don’t even necessarily need to set up their own instance. There will be defed-heavy and defed-light instances users can just choose from based on personal preference. The instance mostly just matters for who federates and internal moderation policy (which is aligned), so it’s not like anyone will be forced one way or another.

    • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Just run your own server! It’s so easy! And if you’re too poor to afford your own server, just get money!

      • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m sorry. Does actually having to put a bit of skin in the game offend you? You’d rather the people spending the actual money and doing the actual work just bow to your whims?

        Compassionate fucking BUDDHA are the anti-defederation crowd a bunch of entitled, whiny asses!

        • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I thought the entire point of federated networks is that they give power to users, not to random rich people. If you want someone with a lot of money to decide what content you can see, you can go back to Twitter and Reddit.

            • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              Ah, so it’s exactly like commercial networks then, where the true users are not those who create content, but those who want to police what other people can talk about.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    Instance admins should defederate as often as they feel is necessary, and users should learn to avoid relying on instances that do it too much.

  • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes.

    What you’re describing is basically the way Twitter works, and there’s a reason vulnerable folk have migrated away from it in large numbers

      • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes, and thus you have one giant mega community in which every bigot can access anyone and everyone else. Which is what a Fediverse without instance blocks would be like

            • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              What? The question was literally “Should instances defederate with other instances anymore if we can filter instances out on our end?”.

                • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Defederation is done by the instance administrator and affects all users. Instance blocking is done by the user and affects only them.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Yes, users shouldn’t have to jump through a million hoops to get a decent feed.

  • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The way federation works is that everything is replicated across all federated servers. If an admin team does not want to have to moderate specific kinds of content or users who are deemed detrimental (but not necessarily illegal) they have the ability and right to defederate.

    Also, I’ve blocked servers but it doesn’t block users. Defederation does though.

  • Kayn@dormi.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Instance owners are responsible for the content that is mirrored on their instance through federation, so they definitely should.

      • Hazzard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Legally responsible, for one.

        I.E. If a federated instance hosted pedophilia, that content would be copied to, and served by, your instance’s infrastructure, which is obviously legally problematic.

  • reddwarf@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Just give me the tools, as a user, to block instances. Not just the way it is done recently but truly block an instance and all it’s posts and users. I want to be able to black hole an entire instance and all things related to it.