• Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    Of all the things you could reasonably criticize the US over, wheelchair accessibility ain’t one of them. Especially compared to Europe.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Especially compared to Europe?

      What? Europe very sound protection for the disabled. Putside of historical buildings built before disability care you won’t find better access anywhere.

      I get America is pretty good too, but your comment makes it sound like Europe is a nightmare for the disabled.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        America has way more wheelchair ramps due to the critically obese population, so the statement is still mostly true.

      • Camelbeard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not sure about how good or bad it is in the US, but in the Netherlands (a place that is known for good infrastructure) it’s definitely not perfect.

        I never realised until we got a baby and I started walking with a stroler. Way too often the sidewalk is inaccessible because of cars or bicycles. Also lots of places without ramps or elevators.

        • Tankton@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          You have a sidewalk, that is obstructed sometimes. Having a sidewalk puts in like the top 10% of countries instantly lol

      • Tvkan@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Europe very sound protection for the disabled. Putside of historical buildings built before disability care you won’t find better access anywhere.

        But that’s the point: Most buildings were built before disability care, and haven’t been upgraded.* Think about your favorite restaurant, bar, kebab place, corner shop etc. – I don’t think any of mine are wheelchair accessible. Also good luck taking a train in Germany, where many platforms aren’t wheelchair accessible and they might or might not have a lift to get you into the train.

        The Americans with Disabilites Act (ADA) is miles ahead of any legal framework that I’m aware of in Europe. The US is a broken country in many ways, but that doesn’t mean that literally anything and everything has to be worse than in glorious Europe.

        *The former is true for the US too, but the ADA still required many of them to make reasonable accomodations.

      • Melllvar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        I get that Europe is pretty good too, but the OP makes it sound like America is a nightmare for the disabled.

        You do see my point, you just don’t like it.

        • lugal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If you wouldn’t have put the last sentence into your first comment, your point would be fine. Same with your second comment

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      huh? america is absolute garbage for wheelchair access, the ADA is absolutely not sufficient

      fuckin have fun navigating the average suburb with a wheelchair, you can’t even walk to the store in most places

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Lmao yes, we are one of the best in that regard.

      Thank you American Disability Act!!

      • Melllvar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I get what the tweet is trying to say. What I’m saying is that wheelchair accessibility is a particularly bad example for that point.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It’s an excellent example. Politicians take something the US does great, and fuck it up because of their religious zealousy.

    • query@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I thought the idea was that Republicans are actively working on destroying what has been working fine and is benefitting lots of people, not just on preventing more progress.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Abortion rights, voting rights, gay marriage, privacy, trans rights, immigration, housing, the economy, net neutrality, take your pick.

            • jorge@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Nope. The topic at hand is free ice-ceam. A topic that you, as a rational adult, can understand that is 100% literal and not at hyperbolic example to make a point about general trends and not a single specific item.

      • gaifux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        As if Democrats don’t do the exact same thing in lock step. Interesting where your focus lies however. It’s helpful though because it indicates your bias.

        • M137@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          The ignorance you’re showing here is absolutely astounding. Banning things and removing certain people’s rights is a defining part of US republican politics. Every damn week, there’s a new thing they’ve decided is evil and needs to be banned. That’s very much not the case with US democrat politics. Sure, there are things they too want to ban or change, but it’s based on logic and not a constant stream of new things.

          • gaifux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yes, thankfully the Democrats aren’t the party of trying to ban stuff. Imagine if they were, and came out of nowhere to like ban gas stoves, gas cars, freedom of medical choices, and gender affirming surgery for kids. If any of that was true then I’d have a pretty good point, but thankfully it isn’t. Right?

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      It always pisses my wife off when I park in a “handicapped” spot that is really just an old spot with badly faded paint.

      For a handicapped parking spot to actually be a handicapped parking spot, you need both the pavement painting and the sign.

      I would like to note that the spots I’m talking about aren’t even the ones close to the building (which is probably why they took down the sign), and there are actual spots closer to the door.

  • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Joke’s on you, they’re just spreading some flavour on all of the snow and it’s all salty licorice.

  • tygerprints@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Per the bible, we aren’t really even allowed to be human beings and are all born wretches full of original sin. If that’s true than I’d rather have the free ice cream and body tattoos and promiscuity while I’m going to hell.

      • tygerprints@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well there never really was a “Jesus” who saved us from original sin, and the bible is simply a work of misogynistic and bigoted fiction. I don’t need “saving,” I’m not a ‘wretch,’ I was never “blind but now I see.” WRONG. WRONG ON ALL COUNTS!!! I am a human being of great value and worth by virtue of my existence, and I don’t require or want dependency on some fictional idiotic being for my salvation or sense of worth.

        • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          A bit dramatic for this conversation… but given the circumstances with some religious people I absolutely get where you’re coming from. We do not need to be given the right to exist by others - we create our value.

          We do not need to be told morality - we create morality (for we do not need to be told “do not be cruel or you will burn in hell,” as we understand that cruelty is for the weak who wish to be powerful, and not needed by the truly powerful.)

          We do not need a god to align our will to - we can direct our collective wills by our own strength. We are worthy or unworthy of love by our own means - we do not need “forgiveness” from anyone but ourselves.

          • tygerprints@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Maybe so but I’m nothing if not overly dramatic most of the time. The reason I go all hystrionic and raving about it is, because sometimes I feel like the only way people hear you or even pay attention is if you go ballistic and overstate things.

            We do create our own morality, and as we learned in philosophy classes, morality is an individual (not social) construct.

            I totally agree with your conclusion that we do not need a “god” to align our will to, as humans we’ve accomplished unbelievable miraculous things on our own. Some may say that’s because of divine design, but I say it’s because we’re just that intelligent. Not so intelligent as a god, maybe - but we should trust in ourselves and absolutely be good to ourselves (forgive ourselves as you say).

          • tygerprints@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            OH yeah. I’m doing great, sometimes I get a little carried away with my statements - but I really am doing great. And I feel I owe that to my own hard work and resilience and not being dependent on a fictional diety (but that’s my way of seeing it).

            • metaStatic@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I sometimes forget that there are people out there that take any of this seriously. I was just explaining a plot point so your reply seemed very out of left field with a chainsaw bear.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Actually, America is one of the most disabled-friendly country in the world when it comes to access struggles like wheelchair ramps and elevators

  • Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Image Transcription: Social Media


    Jesse Case, @jessecase

    The news is always like:

    “America has banned wheelchair ramps because they weren’t in the Bible. Finland has made ice cream free.”

    • tweeks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      There is much to say about reporting biases, but in this case you’re touching one of the most humane services only the most progressive countries have touched on. The ability to pass away in a respectful way on your own terms. No one is being forced or pressured, that’s a blatant lie many media channels are responsible for.

      You don’t choose to be born, if you feel your life is unbearable/complete you should be able to step out of it without having to be kept alive by pills and/or treatments while slowly deteriorating mentally/physically. And don’t get me started on the uncertain outcome and dramatic outcome of suicide, which is usually an insane ‘counter-argument’ that gets proposed as available option.

      Sadly many countries have not yet reached that level of sympathy, mainly because of religious intervention. Which is exactly the point of this post.

    • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Country says it is legal to drink water.

      “Country is executing people by drowning!”

      I’m assuming even the people who agree with you hate the way you’re approaching this. I hope you’re just a troll, because the alternative is that you’re an idiot.