• Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fascinating that they develop this tool and then only release Windows and MacOS versions.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      To be fair, windows and macos are the 2 biggest computer operating systems in the world. It makes a lot more sense to focus on building tools for people using the biggest platforms rather than focus on people using something with a user base fragmented across multiple versions of the same OS.

      Though I do agree a version for Linux would be nice. Even if we have the mac equivalent of wine, darling, I don’t know enough about it to say whether it’s up to the task or not.

    • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s simple math. 97% of the population uses those two operating systems.

      There isn’t much more incentive to go after the 3% Linux users. You know the population that loves free and open source software and isn’t exactly known for dropping a bunch of cash on software. Not to mention it’s a fragmented 3%. Even the flatpak, snap, app images of the world that were supposed to make devs lives easier are fragmented across distros.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Android called. They want their representation in your statistics. Android is Linux.

          • Mango@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Meme aside, that’s a good question… I wonder how much GNU made it into Google’s implementation. Someone here probably knows.

        • KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          No one’s doing this kind of work on their android phone, so you’re argument is pedantic at best in this context.

          • Mango@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            If I can patch a ROM on my phone, you can patch your picture just fine. You don’t have to make it with your phone.

            Also, you’d be surprised at how excellent some drawing apps are on Android. Particularly Ibis.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why develop for developers?

        Why wouldn’t you?

        It’s not like developers get off on reinventing the wheel or something. If somebody has a working solution, I’d rather use that than spend time coming up with code on my own. I’m busy enough as it is.

      • Daxtron2@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        what does being a developer have anything to do with it? Do you really think we only use things we develop ourselves?

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Omg, I can’t believe you actually just said that. 🤣🤣🤣

        Do you know what a library is? How about a language?