I’ve been trying Workstation recently. Python dependency issues caused me to switch to Silverblue for the last 2 years. A new machine with Nvidia got me to try WS. I just had a mystery problem with Python after booting today and that got me looking into Anaconda. I didn’t know it was used under the kernel like this. I’m not sure how I feel about this level of Python integration. I would feel a lot more comfortable with a less accessible precompiled binary but I know I am likely making naïve assumptions saying this. Any thoughts or insights?

  • the_sisko@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Anaconda is just an OS installer program. At least, the Anaconda that you’re referring to. After installation, it’s gone.

    There is also Anaconda which is a Python platform/package system/whatever. Maybe you’re confusing the two?

  • FrankThePug@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My understanding is that the OS Installer Anaconda is only run to install the OS, not at boot time. Python is a mature language, nothing wrong with implementing a not-often run install script in it IMHO. Especially at OS installation time the python environment is very well defined.

  • maxbossing@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would you feel safer if anaconda would use another language like c instead of python, besides performance which doesnt really matter in this scenario?