CrypticCoffee@lemmy.mlM to DeGoogle Yourself@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoMozilla opposes Web Integrity API proposalgithub.comexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.mltechnology@beehaw.orgfirefox@lemmy.ml
arrow-up19arrow-down1external-linkMozilla opposes Web Integrity API proposalgithub.comCrypticCoffee@lemmy.mlM to DeGoogle Yourself@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square9fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.mltechnology@beehaw.orgfirefox@lemmy.ml
minus-squareprofilelost@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoAlthough a comment close below puts a little dent into that ^^ https://github.com/mozilla/> standards-positions/issues/852#issuecomment-1649928726 I guess, even if “it contradicts our principles and vision for the Web.”, it might happen just like the past: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2014/05/reconciling-mozillas-mission-and-w3c-eme/ Formal objection: FLOSS and EME w3c/encrypted-media#378 https://daniele.tech/2014/05/firefox-drm-and-w3c-eme-complicated-technical-matter/
Although a comment close below puts a little dent into that ^^
https://github.com/mozilla/> standards-positions/issues/852#issuecomment-1649928726