• FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It explains why Nature might have been quicker to reject another paper about room temperature superconductivity than they otherwise would have been. But yeah, it’s a little misleading stuck in there like that.

    • MJBrune@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The confusing part specifically is “Similarly-presented research” which doesn’t say why it’s similarly-presented. It sounds like looking into it that it’s just “both were room temperature superconductors” but it could have also meant that “both are about LK-99”, “both are from the same university” or something like that. It’s ambiguous.