• 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They literally don’t though. They don’t try to police sideloaded apps or georestrict other browsers

        • dai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          My takeaway from that article is they don’t, and haven’t.

          The splash screen for installing a package not from the play store is there to protect the end user. Without it there would probably be a much worse unwanted software issue on android.

          I’ve been “side loading” or just “installing” applications on my android devices since the nexus one, without the help of the play store.

          • gray@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s not what the lawsuit is about. Google made backdoor deals to pay developers to release on the play store instead of their own 3rd party app store. They were found at fault for anti-competitive behavior.

            • Flipper@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              That’s a pot calling a kettle black. Epic is doing the same thing with there store.

    • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Except they actually don’t in this case. You’re free to release a browser with any engine you choose on Android and distribute it through the Play Store.