• Joph@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That works until you are forced to interact with a website that only works with it, either by work or school.

        • sunflower_scribe@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There was a lawsuit regarding this just recently, where a student successfully sued over a room scan for an exam. It’s absolutely ridiculous and shouldn’t be tolerated by any student.

      • Barry Zuckerkorn@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s already the case with most corporate managed BYO device policies. The typical scenario is that an employer gives you the choice:

        1. Use the company-owned and company-managed device. No root/admin access, no privileges to install unauthorized software, sometimes policies against personal accounts or files or use.
        2. Bring your own device, but consent to the company’s IT department managing your security and potentially monitoring your use. If you’re going to connect this device to the company’s LAN (through wifi or VPN or otherwise), you’re going to let us lock it down.

        It’s a legitimate concern that these types of things would normalize corporate-managed devices in our personal lives as consumers, and worth resisting in that space, but I don’t think it would actually change the status quo in the corporate world to go from proprietary device management lockdowns to some kind of public standard for lockdowns.

        • randomwords@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which is exactly why I will never do 2. Provide a device if you want control. I will not give you the ability to wipe my personal phone remotely just to check my work email on it.