• ABCDE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    Can it use others, and is there a benefit? USB C makes a lot of sense; lower material usage, small, carries data, power and connects to almost everything now.

    • BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I believe USB-C is the only connector supported for carrying DisplayPort signals other than DisplayPort itself.

      The biggest issue with USB-C for display in my opinion is that cable specs vary so much. A cable with a type c end could carry anywhere from 60-10000MB/s and deliver anywhere from 5-240W. What’s worse is that most aren’t labeled, so even if you know what spec you need you’re going to have a hell of a time finding it in a pile of identical black cables.

      Not that I dislike USB-C. It’s a great connector, but the branding of USB has always been a mess.

      • strawberry@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        would be neat to somehow have a standard color coding. kinda how USB 3 is (usually) blue, maybe there could be thin bands of color on the connector?

        better yet, maybe some raised bumps so visually impaired people could feel what type it was. for example one dot is USB 2, two could be USB 3, etc

      • ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yep, very true. I didn’t understand this until I couldn’t connect my Mac to my screen via the USB C given with the computer, I had to buy another (and order it in specifically). Pick up a cable, and I have no idea which version it is.