Some common words include: “open source”, “free”, “libre”, “FOSS”, “FLOSS”, “closed source”, “non-free”, “proprietary”. Which ones do you like to use or not like to use, and why?

Also, I understand that some of them are not the same (e.g. “free”/“libre” and “open source”), but are sometimes used as if they were. How do you feel about that?

I personally like to use the word proprietary. It has a clear definition, even without the need for something like the Free Software Foundation or the Open Source Initiative to provide one. That cannot be said for words like “free” or “open source”. Both “free” and “open” feel very shaky. I can imagine companies allowing very minor and trivial freedoms to users, to justify promoting themselves and their products as “free” and “open”. That might not work on hardcore enthusiasts like me, but it might be enough to confuse the masses and manipulate the public’s understanding of these words. I feel like we should take that more seriously. But maybe I’m just paranoid. Please tell me what you think about this. I am very curious

  • Wildebeest@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    People hear “free” and only think it refers to the price

    Yes, that’s why I don’t like to use it either.

    GNU-style free software

    I don’t understand what you mean by that.

    I push hard against proprietary software all the time.

    That is good to hear, fellow soldier.

    • jan teli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      GNU-style free software

      I don’t understand what you mean by that

      I think they mean like how gnu/fsf can be a bit fanatical about it