I’ve been on Wayland for the past two years exclusively (Nvidia).

I thought it was okay for the most part but then I had to switch to an X session recently. The experience felt about the same. Out of curiosity, I played a couple of games and realized they worked much better. Steam doesn’t go nuts either.

Made me think maybe people aren’t actually adopting it that aggressively despite the constant coverage in the community. And that maybe I should just go back.

  • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yes. I’ve used X11 for far too long to have any rose tinted glasses for the piece of fucking broken shit it always was. a LOT of people don’t realize how many hacks, workarounds and sheer tears and duct tape goes into making the piece of shit render the smallest line on the screen.

    That’s also why Phoronix comment section neckbeards are so infuriating for me. They talk like X.Org works like at all.

  • MangoKangaroo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Been on it for about a year now, both with my desktop’s A770 and my laptop’s AMD iGPU. Experience has been pretty much flawless.

  • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Zero issues for me. Been daily driving it for years. Play Steam games regularly, but have not tried switching to X. Performance on Windows is MUCH better with my 1080ti playing D4, but I’m prefectly content with preformance on Linux and don’t want to keep switching.

  • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Since I switched to AMD about a month ago. Literally every naggling issue I had with NVidia is gone. Only complaint is that I didn’t switch sooner.

  • Maxxy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I tried Wayland out again last week and all it did was make my monitors flash white and black over and over again. Couldn’t get it to stop unless I restarted. No idea how to fix that since I can’t even do anything past the sign in screen lol. Maybe one day it’ll work.

  • beerclue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve been using Hyprland for about 2 years. I did have some issues with screen sharing (teams, discord) and some steam games (non native, with proton) need some extra launch parameters, but they all work now. Over time I was able to fix all the little issues. For me Hyprland is a daily driver, but I like to tinker. I can see how this is not for everyone.

    • k2helix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      May I ask how you solved the screen sharing problems? Also do you use keybinds for apps such as discord? When I tried Hyprland none of them were working.

      • beerclue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Hey, sorry for the late reply.

        I remember installing xdg-desktop-portal-hyprland instead of xdg-desktop-portal, and in my hyprland config I have:

        exec-once = dbus-update-activation-environment --systemd WAYLAND_DISPLAY XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP
        exec-once = systemctl --user import-environment WAYLAND_DISPLAY XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP
        

        I can’t remember everything I tried… I didn’t keep track. I’ve been using this setup for close to 3 years now…

        I know that for Ferdium I used the extra params --ozone-platform=wayland --enable-features=UseOzonePlatform, but I think it doesn’t need them anymore (I use it for Teams and other chat apps with screensharing).

        For Discord I use Webcord, which works just fine, also with screen sharing, I didn’t have to do anything.

        When it comes to key bindings, here’s my working setup:

        # binds
        $mainMod  = SUPER
        $lock     = playerctl --player=mpd,firefox,mpv -a pause ; ~/.config/hypr/scripts/swaylock
        
        bind = $mainMod,       Q, killactive,
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, Q, exit,
        bind = $mainMod,       X, exec, $lock # lock
        
        bind = $mainMod,       RETURN, exec, alacritty
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, RETURN, exec, alacritty -t scratchpad --class scratchpad
        bind = $mainMod,       E,      exec, nemo
        bind = $mainMod,       W,      exec, firefox
        bind = $mainMod,       R,      exec, rofi -show drun --allow-images
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, E,      exec, wofi-emoji
        bind = $mainMod,       P,      pseudo, # dwindle
        
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, Space, togglefloating,
        bind = $mainMod,       F,     fullscreen, 1 # maximize window
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, F,     fullscreen, 0 # fullscreen
        
        bind = $mainMod,       S, exec, grim -g "$(slurp)" - | wl-copy      # screenshot selection to clipboard
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, S, exec, grim -g "$(slurp)" - | swappy -f -  # screenshot selection and open in swappy
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, R, exec, wf-recorder -a -g "$(slurp)" -f "${HOME}/$(date +%Y-%m-%d_%H-%m-%s).mkv" -c h264_vaapi -d /dev/dri/renderD128 &>/dev/null           # screenrecord
        
        bind  = ,XF86AudioMute,         exec, pactl set-sink-mute @DEFAULT_SINK@ toggle
        binde = ,XF86AudioLowerVolume,  exec, pactl set-sink-volume @DEFAULT_SINK@ -2%
        binde = ,XF86AudioRaiseVolume,  exec, pactl set-sink-volume @DEFAULT_SINK@ +2%
        bind  = ,XF86AudioMicMute,      exec, pactl set-source-mute @DEFAULT_SOURCE@ toggle
        binde = ,XF86MonBrightnessUp,   exec, light -A 5
        binde = ,XF86MonBrightnessDown, exec, light -U 5
        
        # resize windows
        binde = $mainMod, left,  resizeactive, -40 0
        binde = $mainMod, right, resizeactive, 40 0
        binde = $mainMod, up,    resizeactive, 0 -40
        binde = $mainMod, down,  resizeactive, 0 40
        
        # move focus
        bind = $mainMod, h, movefocus, l
        bind = $mainMod, l, movefocus, r
        bind = $mainMod, k, movefocus, u
        bind = $mainMod, j, movefocus, d
        
        # move windows
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, h, movewindow, l
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, l, movewindow, r
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, k, movewindow, u
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, j, movewindow, d
        
        # switch workspaces
        bind = $mainMod, 1, workspace,  1
        bind = $mainMod, 2, workspace,  2
        bind = $mainMod, 3, workspace,  3
        bind = $mainMod, 4, workspace,  4
        bind = $mainMod, 5, workspace,  5
        bind = $mainMod, 6, workspace,  6
        bind = $mainMod, 7, workspace,  7
        bind = $mainMod, 8, workspace,  8
        bind = $mainMod, 9, workspace,  9
        bind = $mainMod, 0, workspace, 10
        
        # move windows to workspace without switching (silent)
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, 1, movetoworkspacesilent,  1
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, 2, movetoworkspacesilent,  2
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, 3, movetoworkspacesilent,  3
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, 4, movetoworkspacesilent,  4
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, 5, movetoworkspacesilent,  5
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, 6, movetoworkspacesilent,  6
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, 7, movetoworkspacesilent,  7
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, 8, movetoworkspacesilent,  8
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, 9, movetoworkspacesilent,  9
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT, 0, movetoworkspacesilent, 10
        
        # move/resize windows with LMB/RMB
        bindm = $mainMod, mouse:272, movewindow
        bindm = $mainMod, mouse:273, resizewindow
        
        # scroll through existing workspaces
        bind = $mainMod, mouse_down, workspace, e+1
        bind = $mainMod, mouse_up,   workspace, e-1
        
        # switch workspace with mouse back/fw buttons
        bind = $mainMod, mouse:276, workspace, m+1
        bind = $mainMod, mouse:275, workspace, m-1
        
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT,up,focusmonitor,u
        bind = $mainMod SHIFT,down,focusmonitor,d
        
        binde = $mainMod, TAB, workspace, previous
        
  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I will daily drive Wayland when it becomes Xorg function equivalent e.g. functional screen capture and overlays like every other OS (so never)

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      nah man, gotta be more specific. When those stuff work on every application.

      A screen reader protocol for blind people that requires the app to be recompiled and opt-in to being accessible to accessibility tools, is not a replacement for one that worked for every application. Old apps will become impossible to use for some people with accessibility issues. Though wayland fanboys would tell you to shut up and be happy that a protocol exists, while failing to acknowledge that the protocol is literally fucking useless by design.

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah. Wayland is a nightmare of accessibility and as someone privileged to be able-bodied it can be tragically easy to forget.

        Hopefully this Wayland fad goes away and we have a better protocol designed from scratch soon.

        • Communist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Why not just make a new protocol for what you need, rather than throwing out everything?

            • Communist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              It’s better in just about every way, objectively, I don’t really know what you’re talking about here.

              You have one issue, accessibility, what other flaws do you see with the wayland protocol?

              Why do you think it is that none of the people who worked on the X protocol would agree with you that wayland is worse in any way?

              What specifically do you think is worse?

              Why do you think literally every single desktop project is switching to wayland with no plans of implementing a different protocol, ever?

              I feel like your version of reality is completely imaginary.

              here’s some things that will never be fixable in x.org

              1. Recording all of your activity is extremely easy for a malicious program
              2. Multiple displays with mixed refresh rates that aren’t clean multiples of eachother
              3. Color management/hdr
              4. Rendering (try resizing something and notice all the garbled nonsense)
              5. Proper scaling support

              There’s more.

              • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I didn’t even point out accessibility? That was a different user. You can’t even read bro talk about imagining and then spitting garbled nonsense. Go back and read everything and then I might reply seriously.

                I’ve not seen Wayland ever outside of this subreddit 🤣

                I’m sure distro of the month somewhere prolly implemented it but us Debian chads stay winning.

                I swear this is a psyop to kill of desktop Linux. Come back when screenshotting works correctly 👌

                • Communist@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Debian has implemented it. Screenshotting has worked perfectly for years, maybe half a decade at this point.

                  edit: I just checked, screenshotting has been working since 2015 https://github.com/swaywm/sway/issues/1

                  Debian has been using wayland by default on gnome since 2019.

                  This is an impressive level of confidence for someone who has no idea what they’re talking about.

                  Also, seeing as you’re the guy who doesn’t even have accessibility problems, that means you have… no problems.

                  Remind me again, what is so bad about wayland?

  • jfx@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I am dependent on a couple of programs I run via wine - and wine still isn’t directly compatible with wayland and buggy with xwayland…

  • Shareni@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why I’m not using it:

    • worse performance (Nvidia)
    • couldn’t get screen sharing and recording to work
    • unfinished or abandoned alternatives to xorg tools (swhkd for example)

    Made me think maybe people aren’t actually adopting it that aggressively despite the constant coverage in the community.

    Take the community with a grain of salt; It’s made up of the same type of people that say Arch is a stable distro that never has any issues.

    Some distros are pushing it aggressively (Fedora for example), so use them as a more accurate gauge. If Fedora doesn’t accept the proposal to start phasing out xorg, you can know for sure it doesn’t have the conversion rates they’re hoping for.

    • Blóðbók@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I think the Xorg vs Wayland situation is not too dissimilar to that of Windows vs Linux. Lots of people are waiting for all of their games/software work (just as well or better) on Linux before switching. I believe that in most cases, switching to Linux requires that a person goes out of their way to either find alternatives to the software they use or altogether change the way they use their computer. It’s a hard sell for people who only use their computer to get their work done, and that’s why it is almost exclusively developers, tech-curious, idealists, government workers, and grandparents who switch to Linux (thanks to a family member who falls into any subset of the former categories). It may require another generation (of people) for X11 to be fully deprecated, because even amongst Linux users there are those who are not interested in changing their established workflow.

      I do think it’s unreasonable to expect everything to work the same when a major component is being replaced. Some applications that are built with X11 in mind will never be ported/adapted to work on Wayland. It’s likely that for some things, no alternatives are ever going to exist.

      Good news is that we humans are complex adaptive systems! Technology is always changing - that’s just the way of it. Sometimes that will lead to perceived loss of functionality, reduction in quality, or impeded workflow in the name of security, resource efficiency, moral/political reasons, or other considerations. Hopefully we can learn to accept such change, because that’ll be a virtue in times to come.

      (This isn’t to say that it’s acceptable for userspace to be suddenly broken because contributors thought of a more elegant way to write underlying software. Luckily, X11 isn’t being deprecated anytime soon for just this reason.)

      Ok I’m done rambling.

    • Mereo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      For NVIDIA users, that’s the right answer. For AMD users, it’s already ready. No problems here (6700xt)