• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I reject the premise that just because more people use Windows, a Windows UX must be the most intuitive and alternatives must appear more complicated to use.

    There are more households that drive cars than ride a bike - is a car therefore a more intuitive to use transport tool than a bike?

    • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s a crazy take though. Everyone knows that what you’re most familiar with is way more intuitive than something you’ve never touched in your life.

      There are more households that drive cars than ride a bike - is a car therefore a more intuitive to use transport tool than a bike?

      How intuitive something is only affects the initial experience. This is why driving a car usually takes a year to learn in most countries - it’s not very intuitive. If you know how to drive a car, however, you can learn to drive a bus much faster - it’s now intuitive because you already know how to drive a car, which is similar.

      So of course whichever DE replicates windows the best is going to be the most intuitive. Doesn’t mean that it’s better once you’ve gotten used to it though.