• AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The film tells a story of a woman named Jennifer Pan, who was convicted of orchestrating a murder-for-hire plot against her parents in Canada back in 2010.

    Now the executive producer of the documentary, Jeremy Grimaldi, has weighed in in an interview with the Toronto Star — but his remarks are hard to parse, and made no direct mention of AI.

    Grimaldi’s comments are extremely vague on a core point: exactly what “photo editing software” did the team use to “anonymize” the images, and did they involve AI?

    Regardless of intent, the use of AI-generated images in a true crime documentary has stirred a heated debate, with viewers and fellow documentarians accusing Netflix of distorting the historical record by failing to disclose the use of AI — which they say could set a dangerous precedent.

    “Netflix has a long history of airing true crime docs with dubious standards of journalistic ethics,” one redditor wrote.

    As 404 Media reports, filmmakers were gathering right around the time we published our story on Sunday to discuss guidelines for how to safely and responsibly use generative AI.


    The original article contains 639 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!