No, it means they specifically did not hear anything, not that it isn’t happening. The president of the University of Wyoming made multiple statements, all under oath, that ended up being in direct support of hate speech and harassment of transgender persons just a couple months ago. I am actively watching and hearing hate speech on campus, and the college president encourages it as free speech. There is no doubt in my mind the Columbia president is trying to pull similar optics in defence of these atrocities, I have been witnessing college presidents do the same thing in Wyoming for close to a decade now.
Considering she was under oath, anything other than the truth would be perjury
No, it means they specifically did not hear anything, not that it isn’t happening. The president of the University of Wyoming made multiple statements, all under oath, that ended up being in direct support of hate speech and harassment of transgender persons just a couple months ago. I am actively watching and hearing hate speech on campus, and the college president encourages it as free speech. There is no doubt in my mind the Columbia president is trying to pull similar optics in defence of these atrocities, I have been witnessing college presidents do the same thing in Wyoming for close to a decade now.
Right. And no college president ever lied under oath. Also, if reports aren’t logged with receipts-
There’s no reports.
Either way. If you think this isn’t happening, you’re as naive as they get. Just look at the shit people post here on lemmy.
Seems Foolish for her to lie during one line of questioning considering 95% of the hearing was Congress cracking down on Americans right to protest.
Okay man. You really want to believe this so I won’t stand in the way.
Have a good evening.
You really want to believe something there is no evidence for and people have refuted under oath. You only believe what you want to believe.