I was Nobara user, then I am using Fedora right now. I want to use things like Hyprland etc. and ya know, Its damn cool to say I am using arch btw. So I’ve decided to use Arch Linux. But everyone says its always breaking and gives problems. That’s because of users, not OS… right? I love to deal with problems but I don’t want to waste my time. Is Arch really problemful OS? Should I use it? I know what to do with setup/ usage, the hardness of Arch is not problem for me but I am just concerned about the mindset “Arch always gets broken”.

  • Responsabilidade@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Who thinks that Arch always broke is one of the two:

    • An user that is trying to mess with the system always; or
    • A person that don’t know Arch and is repeating non-sense

    My Arch install has almost 5 years and I never had an issue that was like “oh no! O need to reinstall everything!”

    Interesting enough, when I was using release-based distros, almost every big update my system become unstable and I had to reinstall me whole system.

    • bitahcold@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      As far as i see from the comments, I understood what i have to. I see that Arch has no problem in itself, the problem is user. I decided to install Arch on my pc finally. Thanks for your reply. Have a nice day.

    • 999999999@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree, I am the person in the first case that has broken entry-level distros and Arch but once one learns the ways everything works all the time.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I had one btrfs partition that just got corrupted for some reason. One day after changing nothing except updating the system, I rebooted and the partition wouldn’t boot. Lost a lot of good stuff on it. This was Arch, but I don’t think it has anything to do with it being Arch…

    • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The only times Arch broke for me were when I broke it. There were 2 exceptions, however.

      1. I once went a long time (a few weeks) without updating and I had issues relating to keys and the pacman keyring. Luckily, Erik Dubois had a video about exactly that and the system was fixed within <30 minutes (including finding the video and watching it)

      2. The other time my computer turned off during an update which involved updating the kernel so my system broke (I can’t remember if I turned it off or if it ran out of battery). I recovered it using live media, chrooting and doing an update again from inside the chroot, which fixed it. Once again, took about 30 mins.

      Every other case of breakage was caused by me actively tinkering with the system.

      I should note that this doesn’t include minor issues like some configuration no longer working because of an update or something like that, as 1. this isn’t a system-level breakage and 2. it isn’t Arch’s fault.