• andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    IIRC, 5g is a much nicer generation for the carriers than for consumers. It can be more easily deployed with microcells on light poles vs requiring the tall cell towers. There’s ultra-wideband, which is definitely faster, but plain 5g is roughly the same, just easier to roll out.

    • FonsNihilo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      As someone who plays a role in installs 5g at cell sites/towers that is incorrect.

      You might be thinking of a Repeater, to boost signals were cell service is dodgy.

      The physical equipment for 5g vs 4g, while the internals of the device are different the exterior is almost the exact same, expect there are some more ports and stuff on the 5g devices.

      Think of it as a server rack with a bunch of servers running in it. Server racks are designed to be swapped in and out. Build your new server outside the rack, unplug the old one, drop the new one in, and plug it in. Cellular infrastructure works nearly the same way, expect it’s more complex.

    • applepie@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Thank you!

      Don’t we all love funding CapEx of a shiti compamy that really doesn’t even benefit us?