• Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s not fair to Google+.

    I actually liked that platform over Facebook.

    It’s a shame they had to cram it down people’s throat. It would’ve been a fantastic alternative to Facebook. I especially liked it’s friend organization feature with circles.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It was really much better than fb and other platforms, really easy to group and filter content on it.

      I just hated their forced integration with YouTube comments section which only served to artificially pump up the number of G+ users. Great platform, bad management decisions.

      • philycheeze@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        They only did that AFTER releasing it as a walled garden that people had to jump through a bunch of hoops to join.

        • Jesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Funny that Blue Sky just did that same old thing. Launched like a VIP club with a limited guest list. Even though that tactic hasn’t really worked well for most people since the 00’s.

          • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            also - blue sky was eating glue while twitter was falling and lost a lot of attention to threads