• the_doktor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I am just hoping governments will see the massive issues and copyright problems with AI and ban that garbage outright soon so all these companies eager to add their AI trash to every single product they ship will stop.

    • sweng@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There is no general copyright issue with AIs. It completely depends on the training material (if even then), so it’s not possible to make blanket statements like that. Banning technology, because a particular implementation is problematic, makes no sense.

      • the_doktor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The only relevant training material to make a truly complete dataset must include copyrighted material or you do not have a full set of data to draw from and thus it is useless. Stop defending this horrible technology.

        • sweng@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          What do you mean “full set if data”?

          Obviously you can not train on 100% of material ever created, so you pick a subset. There is a a lot of permissively licensed content (e.g. Wikipedia) and content you can license (e.g. Reddit). While not sufficient for an advanced LLM, it certainly is for smaller models that do not need wide knowledge.