• macniel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Hahahaha… No.

    You (potentially) voted for this. You will suffer it as well!

    Also all of my and everyones correspondence is confidental, now what? We in Germany have a law (Postgeheimnis) for that as well!

  • MrOtherGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    15 days ago

    Absolutely not. If anything, public officials would be the one group whose messaging I would understand being scanned so that the people can sort of keep them on check. But again, implementing such possibility that would still weaken security of everyone else as well so of course it should not actually be done.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    So the implication is that keeping the masses in check is the primary goal and protecting the children was the incidental part?

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 days ago

    The law must apply to all, including public servants. As they are beholden to the public, they are subject to review and FOIA requests are automatically granted for the content.

    Remember the rule of authoritarians: if someone wants to stop you from being suspicious, they want to stop you from doing the same things they’ve done.