Developers should not design encryption algorithms. They should instead implement algorithms that were designed by a mathematician.
This is a secondary account that sees the most usage. My first account is listed below. The main will have a list of all the accounts that I use.
Personal website:
Developers should not design encryption algorithms. They should instead implement algorithms that were designed by a mathematician.
proprietary encryption algorithm
Oh God why would you do this.
The rule of law seems awfully flimsy today.
Happy to see more apps offering convenient flatpaks.
This is some really expensive hardware for a processor that’s a couple generations behind in performance.
Also, I’m surprised these can be shipped to the US. I thought this tech was sanctioned or something related to it, or perhaps, it might soon be.
EDIT: Ah, looks like it’s legal to purchase even as an entry on the US Entity List, but I am not a lawyer.
I love ARM so much compared to x86, but speaking from a low-cost consumer server perspective, x86 is a great value, and it comes with a no compromises on software compatibility.
I don’t think the car brand comparison is a great one. While I get your point, the purpose of using different car brand names is not for confusion but actually to reduce confusion — to clarify which products are targeting a luxury market.
For a counter example, consider how Samsung sells premium and cheap smart phones. The cheap smart phones give Samsung a bad name which might be associated with the higher end offering in the eyes of a consumer.
It’s not fair to compare to Toyota to Lexus because a Lexus is targeting a different customer and making different trade-offs in their product, even though it’s the same company.
The recent Pi chips are heavily modified. They’re becoming less and less like their TV tuner roots. I wouldn’t exactly call it a failed product line either. I thought that IP went into numerous devices.
Interesting concept. This might actually be usable for me because my display is super wide. Websites generally don’t handle extremely wide displays very well, so as of today it’s wasted space.
Very cool, but as someone who has difficulty swallowing pills, I doubt I could get that down. Maybe if my life depended on it.
So the implication is that keeping the masses in check is the primary goal and protecting the children was the incidental part?
Sometimes, easy accessibility is a bad thing. Nobody profits off a large user base here. We should instead focus on having good users and a platform that serves those users.
Competition doesn’t really exist anymore. Instead, via regulatory capture, the big players simply change the rules to exclude competition.
That only works if you have competition. We don’t really have free markets. The consolidation is so extreme that auto makers for example really don’t care if consumers want a high value budget EV. Why should they? They can make you collectively buy something else when you need a car to get to work.
Automation-prone fields like writing, software, and app development saw a 21% decrease in job listings
Maybe, but hard disagree that software is being automated away.
It’s the concentration of money and its interests. It corrupts purpose.
You are kind. You did good.
I will buy a battery service before I stop using Firefox. I can’t browse without a quality ad blocker.
And reading comprehension.
Starbucks can be pressured to require your personal information to connect to WiFi.
Interesting! Did not know that. It’s possible he may be qualified, so I’m still skeptical of closed crypto systems.