• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This would be a handy way to get rid of half your staff, but the people you chase away are usually the ones you want to keep. As per the Dead-Sea Effect, the ones who will leave are the ones who generally are more able to, who will be your most employable people, and thus your most talented. Usually.

    Making work suck, and letting the best half of the staff bail, seems like stupid and a game show.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I read somewhere that convincing people to quit was party of some companies’ plan when demanding return to office, but as you pointed out, they probably lost their top 10% or more in the quality workers group. So do that introvert parasites can have their “corporate culture” (or more critically, justify leading that bigass office building).

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Dell announced a new return-to-office initiative earlier this year. In the new plan, workers had to classify themselves as remote or hybrid.

    Those who classified themselves as hybrid are subject to a tracking system that ensures they are in a physical office 39 days a quarter, which works out to close to three days per work week.

    Alternatively, by classifying themselves as remote, workers agree they can no longer be promoted or hired into new roles within the company.

    Holy corporate oppression, Batman! That’s a shitty deal no matter which option you choose.

    I’m glad they’ve got themselves into a sticky situation.

    Also, this observation was funny (in a sad way):

    One person said they’d spoken with colleagues who had chosen to go hybrid, and those colleagues reported doing work in mostly empty offices punctuated with video calls with people who were in other mostly empty offices.

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      One major downside of hybrid working really is that if you are having a meeting where even a single person is not there, then the entire meeting may as well be a video call. If you are on a video call, then why do you need to be in the office for it?

      At my job we work with physical objects, so being in office is a requirement at least part of the time, but if I’m just going to be in meetings for most of the day, there is no way I’m going into the office just to sit on video calls all day.

  • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    They work in tech, promotions are achieved by moving employers. Internal mobility is always terrible in tech companies.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Very much this. I have never switched employers and not received a sizable salary bump in the process. This isn’t quite “don’t threaten me with a good time” territory, but it’s not far removed from it.

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Anyone want to start a company. Work from home. We’ll split profits among ourselves. We can. Build blackjack lottery machines and webhookers