~~https://www.neowin.net/news/ublock-origin-developer-recommends-switching-to-ublock-lite-as-chrome-flags-the-extension/~~

EDIT: Apologies. Updated with a link to what gorhill REALLY said:

Manifest v2 uBO will not be automatically replaced by Manifest v3 uBOL[ight]. uBOL is too different from uBO for it to silently replace uBO – you will have to explicitly make a choice as to which extension should replace uBO according to your own prerogatives.

Ultimately whether uBOL is an acceptable alternative to uBO is up to you, it’s not a choice that will be made for you.

Will development of uBO continue? Yes, there are other browsers which are not deprecating Manifest v2, e.g. Firefox.

  • 0oWow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Brave has added a feature to explicitly enable MV2 apps and install uBo directly from Brave settings. You can also install uMatrix and Adguard MV2 versions also.

      • 0oWow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        And jump to the clone? Mozilla isn’t better (consider their recent Ad Privacy clone), they just have less market share.

        That said, I use Firefox and Brave. Whatever I feel like at the time.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The clone? Are you implying that mozilla (founded 1998) is a clone of chrome (first launched 2008)?

          Just use anything but chome or chromium if you can. Just don’t feed the beast now known as alphabet.