As they improve, we’ll likely trust AI models with more and more responsibility. But if their autonomous decisions end up causing harm, our current legal frameworks may not be up to scratch.
Why would the lawyer defendant not know they’re interacting with AI? Would the AI generated content appear to be actual case law? How would that confusion happen?
There are going to be a lot of instances going forward where you don’t know you were interacting with an AI.
If there’s a quality check on the output, sure, they’re liable.
If a Tesla runs you into an ambulance at 80mph…the very expensive Tesla lawyers will win.
It’s a solid quandary.
Why would the lawyer defendant not know they’re interacting with AI? Would the AI generated content appear to be actual case law? How would that confusion happen?