• delirious_owl@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    I had a detecting propaganda workshop when i was a kid in a school in the US. Its not mandatory everywhere, but we do teach these things

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      should be mandatory everywhere and repeated every couple years throughout education because it evolves very fast

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      And I don’t mean this in any mean way, but how much propaganda did you learn to detect? Like understanding that the american dream is a propaganda?

      • delirious_owl@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Me? I thought the class was dumb because it was super obvious. But I’m inherently skeptical, and I do think its important to have for most people who don’t think critically.

        I can’t remember the details, but I suspect it was things like who wrote it? Are the claims cited? Who are they citing? Is it peer reviewed? What is the author trying to convey? What type of language is being used? Who is the target audience? Etc

        • XTL@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Still better than nothing. Although most of those seem to be training people that “who said it” is how truthfulness of a statement should be judged which is exactly backwards.

          • delirious_owl@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The point is to understand the concept of credibility. Who said it matters. Some people have a demonstrated history if credibility. Some people have a demonstrated history of incredibly.