Which OS has the steep learning curve and is considered hardest?

  • Gentoo ( I have been using it for 3 years now, until I have to switch to Ubuntu for research sake. I love it’s philosophy and I kinda feel even my lifestyle changed after Gentoo. Tried it’s successors, redstar, cosmic mod didn’t liked much.)
  • Arch Linux ( when I got into Linux, everyone was like, I use arch btw. So tried it first with gnome, then kde, then i3, then i3 gaps and tui, then used openrc, then used runit. Helped me lot to install Gentoo. But Gentoo transformed me into something else)
  • Nix OS ( I was hearing about it since 2022. I wanted to try, and now I am gonna install and use it. I’m planning)

My question is, which among these is considered to be hardest and thus by mastering it, one can master linux to atleast some part? (excluding network management, ofsec, netsec, forensics, etc)

  • kolorafa@lemmy.world
    8·
    1 year ago

    From the list … I would go with:

    Arch Linux - if you want to learn how to partition you drive, setup bootloader, manage packages from terminal, setup EFI, and such, probably tasks that will help you for example in cases when windows would override bootlaoder/efi and you want to recover/fix your Linux OS without reinstall, or you broken it and you want to fix it.

    Nix OS - if you want to learn how to serialize your OS to an reproducible state with later ways to use Nix packages on other distros if needed. If you break it, you will just revert to older revision or reinstall everything in a matter of minutes (if not seconds) from few files. You will learn way different set of skills than Arch as you will only ‘define’ what you want your partition and bootloader should look, and NixOS will take care of that almost magically, but you could use Nix packages on top of Arch or any other distro.

    Gentoo - if you want to learn how all those packages are build and installed from sources, how to patch and modify them when needed, how much time you gain with distro with prebuild packages if you decide to build everything, but on the other hand how much performance you ‘could’ gain from optimized builds or how easy is to install anything you want in any way you want. (Didn’t use Gentoo myself, as installing stuff from AUR on my desktop Arch is all I need to experience how much time it could take :) So Gentoo would probably not be the hardest but most time consuming, but I could be wrong)

  • sntx@lemm.ee
    5·
    1 year ago

    You’re in a good position to “master” NixOS, but I don’t think it’ll help you to achieve your goal of getting better at Linux.

    NixOS will help you with declarative systems (“mastering” NixOS will help you working with it’s sibling Guix for example), but because so many things are specific to the declarative configuration, it won’t help you in many other places (not with you current knowledge, apart from functional progamming I guess).

    If you want to “master” linux, maybe check out linuxfromscratch.org

    Edit 1 (spelling)

  • datendefekt@lemmy.ml
    3·
    1 year ago

    Sorry, but I can’t follow. Shouldn’t an OS be easy to use so that it gets out of the way so that you have more time for the real work you have to do?

    For example I tried out using plain Fedora Server for my NAS but went back to unRAID. I just didn’t want to spend all that time figuring out why the samba server isn’t visible or why the drives aren’t spinning down, etc etc.

    • Fryboyter@discuss.tchncs.de
      3·
      1 year ago

      I think it depends on the individual user. Many prefer a solution that simply works. But some prefer to look behind the scenes and tweak everything.

      When it comes to cars, it’s the same. There are people who only want to drive from A to B with their car. I am one of those people. Others, on the other hand, want to repair their car themselves as much as possible. Which I understand in principle, but I prefer to leave that to a workshop.

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    3·
    1 year ago

    I think Gentoo and Arch are quite similar but Gentoo needs more work. Not harder, but more annoying and time-consuming.

    • CheshireSnake@iusearchlinux.fyi
      2·
      1 year ago

      Haven’t tried Nix OS yet, but yeah I can see the similarities in Gentoo and Arch. I think Gentoo with its compilation times is more of a headache (with better(?) rewards?). I think the last time I had to compile on Arch was for a kernel I wanted to try.

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
        3·
        1 year ago

        On recent hardware compiling everything from source doesn’t give that much a of a performance boost. On older hardware (i586/i686 era) this was different. But in my opinion the hassle simply doesn’t worth it anymore. My machine has plenty of unused resources and compilers nowadays do a really good job in optimizing the result.

        Can’t say anything about Nix OS. As far as I know it does some things different when it comes to configuration.

        • CheshireSnake@iusearchlinux.fyi
          2·
          1 year ago

          On recent hardware compiling everything from source doesn’t give that much a of a performance boost.

          Agreed. The only reason I considered Gentoo is because my laptop is a potato.

          • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
            3·
            1 year ago

            Is it just a potato, or is it an ancient potato? Arch runs on fairly old hardware as long as it’s 64 bits hardware. The oldest device I have must be from around 2014 and it runs okay.

      • Corngood@lemmy.ml
        2·
        1 year ago

        IMO NixOS has all the benefits of Gentoo. I can quite easily:

        • build everything in my system with custom compiler flags
        • patch/reconfigure my kernel
        • change how a specific package (say openssl) is built

        But at the same time, anything I don’t customise is pulled from the shared binary cache instead of being built locally.

        • CheshireSnake@iusearchlinux.fyi
          1·
          1 year ago

          But at the same time, anything I don’t customise is pulled from the shared binary cache instead of being built locally

          This sounds pretty good. Like Gentoo and Arch mixed depending on what you’re installing? Gonna read up more on it when I have time. I just scanned their website quickly and they did sound a lot like Gentoo.

          • Corngood@lemmy.ml
            2·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I mean I switched to it from arch because it felt so messy doing upgrades, testing graphics drivers, kernel patches, etc on a mutable system. I would have to use filesystem snapshots to have any chance of rolling things back sanely.

            NixOS makes it very low risk and easy to do system changes like that.

        • Elmiar@lemmygrad.mlOP
          1·
          1 year ago

          Ohh. Ok.

          And they say that in nix os we can have different versions and builds of same software, driver or even kernel (kernel, we can do that in Gentoo too). Is that true?

          • Corngood@lemmy.ml
            2·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, it’s great for testing kernels because you can build a customised one and then immediately roll back (previous configs can be selected in the bootloader)

  • bceuhwps@lemmy.ml
    3·
    1 year ago

    As both arch and gentoo has very good documentation, and is very standard Linux as it “always” has been, I don’t see anything hard about them. Nix is a different beast and you need to learn some new approaches.

    • Elmiar@lemmygrad.mlOP
      1·
      1 year ago

      Anyways I have decided to try nix os. Yes, I’ll see whether I can learn setting it up too.

  • Fryboyter@discuss.tchncs.de
    3·
    1 year ago

    My question is, which among these is considered to be hardest and thus by mastering it, one can master linux to atleast some part?

    It does not matter which distribution you use. For example, I am using Arch for over 10 years. Have I gained any new knowledge since then? Sure. But not because I use Arch but because I had to do certain tasks. Or because I was interested in certain things. I even go so far as to say that I got a lot of my Linux knowledge under Mandrake / Mandriva (comparable to Ubuntu) because that was the distribution I used initially.

    From my point of view, it is therefore only important that you want to learn something. Whether you use Ubuntu, OpenSuse, Arch or Gentoo for this is basically irrelevant.

    Apart from that, I don’t think Arch is a difficult distribution to install or use. For example, many of the commands in the official installation guide can be executed without any changes. Or if you want to make it even easier, just use archinstall which has been an official part of the iso file for some time.

    As for maintaining Arch, I’ve been doing exactly two things for years.

    Before an update, I check if anything has been released at https://archlinux.org/news/ that affects my installations (this can be automated with tools like informant). It is important to follow these instructions.

    And from time to time I synchronize my configuration files with the Pacnew files. There are tools for this as well (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Pacman/Pacnew_and_Pacsave#Managing_.pac*_files).

    In other words, just use the distribution that suits you and learn what you need. Learning things on spec that you may never need is useless in my opinion.

  • Hibby@lemmy.ml
    3·
    1 year ago

    You could always go down the Slackware route. It’s only hard because it does some stuff differently and doesn’t have a huge userbase.

    • Arcaneslime@lemmy.ml
      2·
      1 year ago

      How hard is it? I really want to try Slackware one day but I’m not the most adept at linux yet. Really only have experience with Fedora, Tails, Puppy, and antix so far.

      Hard to find people to ask about it, as you said because of the smaller userbase. I did look yesterday though and there are some youtube videos on slackware 15 set up, so I may be ok with those. Still kinda nervous lol.

      • Hibby@lemmy.ml
        3·
        1 year ago

        If you want to know the story of Slackware, this is a really well researched history. There are daily users that can chime in better than I can, but Slackware was my first exposure to Linux and it’s definitely not “dead” like you might see posted around the internet. Like any distro, what you get out of it depends on how how much effort you put in. It’s doable, but it will take some work on your part and some patience.

        • Arcaneslime@lemmy.ml
          2·
          1 year ago

          I actually am interested partly because of their history, the creator is of the same religion as I am and his creation was announced in like '94 on the old Hour Of Slack radio show affiliated with said religion. In fact, Slackware is a direct nod to our concept of Slack, and there’s even pics of our guru J. R. “Bob” Dobbs on the slackware site in the banners section. I know it isn’t dead because 15 came out earlier this year (or was it late last year?) so they must be active and not dead, just hard to find lol.

          Thanks for the advice, I’ll maybe try it on an old asus I use mainly for booting tails on soon. That’s the only device I have with windows for emergencies and nothing I have is powerful enough to run VMs I don’t think, but tbh that windows install barely works and I haven’t needed it in two years, so “fuck it,” right?

          • Hibby@lemmy.ml
            1·
            1 year ago

            Exactly. You are bound to learn something along the way, even if it’s not for you in the long run. All it costs is your time. As you said, fuck it. Give it a whirl.

            • Arcaneslime@lemmy.ml
              1·
              1 year ago

              I think I will soon, thanks for the pep talk lol, I legit did need it! I think that even if the process is a little tough, it’s possible that the product brings me Slack. Hell maybe I’ll like the process too, who knows, learning can bring Slack sometimes too!

    • rtbravo@lemmy.world
      1·
      1 year ago

      This right here: Linux From Scratch (LFS).

      If your goal is to learn, there is no better way than retrieving each tool individually and compiling it from the bottom up. LFS is Gentoo … without all the ease of use built in. More accurately, LFS is a just a set of instructions for where to go to get the code and how to compile everything you need to build a Linux system from the bottom up.

      I don’t live in the world of LFS or Gentoo, but my foray into LFS gave me a much greater appreciation for the distribution(s) I do use as daily drivers. I greatly appreciate my distribution maintainers.

  • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
    2·
    1 year ago

    I’ve not done Gentoo since about 2006/7 after running as a primary OS for about 2-3 years - It taught me lots about system maintenance. I then move to SUSE and *BSD desktops before coming back to Windows as my OS for daily use (have to for work).

    I don’t think it really matters what poison you choose, just dig down in to it’s inner workings.